Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/19085
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorمنصف فيلالي-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-
dc.date.available2018-06-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.issn1112- 9808-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/19085-
dc.descriptionDafatir Droit et politiqueen_US
dc.description.abstractThe penal judgment has two effects: negative and positive. The former one is obtained from the devoted principle in internal laws and it is double jeopardy which means that the disciplinary judgment has the authority of the final decision in front of the national public authorities, but the principle is not absolute, countries have already worked with it using different provisions from a country to another. The same thing for the later one (positive effect) despite the orientation towards the approval of the implementation of foreign penal provisions outside the country borders that issued a writ. However, the majority of state legislation is still influenced by the idea of sovereignty, so it does not accept it, unless there are conditions such as the existence of an international convention that biases it.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnumero 19 2018 dafatir volume 2;-
dc.subjectForeign penal judgmenten_US
dc.subjectthe authority of final decisionen_US
dc.subjectthe national judgeen_US
dc.subjectthe execution of the penal lawen_US
dc.subjectinternational conventionsen_US
dc.subjectthe principle of sovereigntyen_US
dc.titleقوة الحكم الجزائي الأجنبي أمام القضاء الوطنيen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:numéro 19 2018 Dafatir vol 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
D1951.pdf169,6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.