Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/20509
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | عمر بوقـمـرة | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06 | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2478-0197 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/20509 | - |
dc.description | Al Alama | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | grammar, rhetoric are two important Arabic science, have existed to serve the Koran. Grammar has appeared to fight mispronouncing was diffused on the tongues of reciters, and rhetoric has appeared to stand up against defamations from atheists about impotence of Koran. Really both sciences execute its fundamental function very well. Perhaps this collective function between them caused interference area between both concepts anciently and recently. If we accept the honor of a scientific grammar, rhetoric and their necessity as two keys for correct understanding of the Book of Allah, does that mean they operate severally ?Or their relationship? If there was a relationship of what nature? What are the limits? And how they looked at it Rhetoric scholars, past and present? What is the look Abdelmalek Mortad it? That is problematic hidden behind these sub-questions that we are trying to answer in this paper. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | other | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Numéro 6 2018; | - |
dc.subject | grammar | en_US |
dc.subject | rhetoric | en_US |
dc.subject | function | en_US |
dc.subject | language | en_US |
dc.subject | system | en_US |
dc.title | التواشج الوظيفي بين النحو والبلاغة عند مرتاض - دراسة نقدية – | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Al Alama N 06 / Vol 3, N1 2018 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.