Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/22303
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorلوز عواطف-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-
dc.date.available2020-01-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.issn1112- 9808-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/22303-
dc.descriptionDafatir Droit et politiqueen_US
dc.description.abstractLow-risk cases are an obstacle to the effectiveness of justice and made the fact of resorting to alternative and concise ways to solve these disputes, an imperative matter. Achieving the objectives of the procedural penal rule sometimes requires a concise procedure, in order to remedy the quantitative inflation of low-risk crimes within the framework of modern criminal policy directions, and concise procedures mean shortening and accelerating them.This requires simplifying them by going beyond the formalities prescribed in normal circumstances The most important of which is the penalty order, which we concluded, through the analysis of its provisions, to a general conclusion namely that it is a brief, quick and summary ruling on the public proceedings without investigation or argument, and self-executing. Nevertheless, it is a confiscation of the principles of a fair trial, the most important of which is the legality, the presence of parties and the public character.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol 12, N 1 2020 (22);-
dc.subjectsummary proceedingsen_US
dc.subjectpenalty orderen_US
dc.subjectfair trialen_US
dc.titleSummary Criminal Proceedings in the Balance of Fair Trial Principles - Penalty Order as a Model -en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:volume 12 N 1 2020 Dafatir

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
D1228.pdf300,41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.