Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/6670
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalim Fathy Meridji-
dc.date.accessioned2004-
dc.date.available2004-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.issn1112-3672-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/6670-
dc.descriptionRevue Al Atharen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper intends, first, to expose the two ambiguities related to both the term ‘political discourse’ and the notion ‘political discourse analysis.’ The two ambiguities are clearly explained. Later, the concern of the paper will be with the two confusions existing in both Shapiro’s (1981) and Graber’s (1981) definitions of political discourse. At the end, the very appropriate definition of political discourse is provided. Actually, defining political discourse on the basis of contextual features blocks the rise of ambiguities and confusions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnuméro 03 2004;-
dc.subjectpolitical discourser analysis-
dc.subjectambiguity-
dc.subjectconfusion-
dc.subjectcritical linguistics-
dc.subjectcontext-
dc.subjectinstitution-
dc.subjectpolitical genres-
dc.titlePolitical Discourse Analysis between Ambiguities and Clarityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:numéro 03 2004

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
T0310.pdf48,92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.