Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/23925
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorجودي عمران-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-28T08:47:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-28T08:47:27Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-31-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/23925-
dc.descriptionRevue des Sciences Sociales et Humainesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this article we will discuss the new ideas that have characterized analytical philosophy as a dividing line between the traditional concept of philosophy, which depends on the things (adoption of experience) and the contemporary concept of thought based on the understanding of words with ideas (language analysis), which makes us stand on three new features we address in detail later, we mean primarily the centrality of language, As well as the theory of common sense as a set facts on which scientists stand.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.subjectLogical analysisen_US
dc.subjectlinguistic analysisen_US
dc.subjectmeaningen_US
dc.subjectsymbolen_US
dc.subjectcommon senseen_US
dc.subjectlinguistic centralityen_US
dc.titleProblematic meaning in scientific discourseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:numéro 41 SSH V12 N1 B 2020

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S4138.pdf204,59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.