Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/24922
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | نجلاء نجاحي | - |
dc.contributor.author | فائزة زيتوني | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-18T18:47:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-18T18:47:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-31 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2253-0029 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/24922 | - |
dc.description | Revue Makalid | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Stanley Hyman suggested an integral method, for an ideal critic, combining all the practical ways and methods for producing a paramount creation. He considers it as a flexible method, which isn’t limited to a specific method, but looks for studying all the literary works through several critical methods to which the critic can refer to for comprehension Our questions are as follows: is there a possibility for emerging an a new Western critical theory concerned with the literary production? What are the mechanisms that ought to be adopted and followed in studying the literary works? What are the mechanisms that ought to be adopted and followed in studying the literary works | en_US |
dc.language.iso | other | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol 7, N 2 2021; | - |
dc.subject | the critical theory | en_US |
dc.subject | the ideal critic | en_US |
dc.subject | the real critic | en_US |
dc.subject | the combination | en_US |
dc.title | The new crriittiicall ttheorry iin tthe Wesstterrn crriittiiciissm A rreadiing iin Sttanlley Hyman’’ss prrojjectt bettween tthe I Ideall and tthe rreall crriittiic | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Vol 7, N 2 2021 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
M70203.pdf | 379,21 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Admin Tools