Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/28171
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohammed Saidat-
dc.contributor.authorAmhammed Tighezza-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T07:33:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-19T07:33:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-28-
dc.identifier.issn1112-9263-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/28171-
dc.descriptionPsychological & Educational Studies Reviewen_US
dc.description.abstractIf the purpose of research in the human and social sciences is the production of scientific knowledge, then how do we proceed? What are these methods? Are these research outcomes valid, legitimate, and accepted by the scientific community? In other words, what are the epistemological frameworks used in research? This article tends to clarify the nature of epistemological paradigms, to understand what is meant by epistemological questioning, to examine the implications of epistemological assumptions for research practices, and finally to understand the main contemporary epistemological tendencies and paradigm that have dominated quantitative and qualitative research.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnumber 31 2022 vol 15 n 1;-
dc.subjectEpistemological frameworken_US
dc.subjectParadigmen_US
dc.subjectPost-positivismen_US
dc.subjectConstructivismen_US
dc.subjectInterpretativismen_US
dc.titleThe epistemological background tendencies underscoring Psychological, Educational, Social, Management, Quantitative, and qualitative researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:number 31 2022 vol 15 n 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
44.pdf785,4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.