Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/40204
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorمنزر رابح-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T06:43:51Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-03T06:43:51Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-31-
dc.identifier.issn1112- 9808-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/40204-
dc.descriptionDafatir Droit et politiqueen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on clarifying the role played by the competent judicial authorities in upholding the principle of the rule of law when considering disputes arising from construction and development works. When damage results from or in connection with such works, the injured party has the right to resort to the ordinary or administrative courts to assert their rights or obtain fair compensation. From this perspective, this paper aims to highlight the limits of the jurisdiction of both the administrative and ordinary courts when dealing with construction and reconstruction disputes, and to explain how they contribute to achieving justice and protecting rights within the framework of the rule of lawen_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesvolume 18 N 1 2026 Dafatir;-
dc.subjectUrban planningen_US
dc.subjectdamageen_US
dc.subjectjudicial systemen_US
dc.subjectpenaltyen_US
dc.subjectadministrative violationen_US
dc.titleJudicial bodies competent in matters of urban planning violationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:volume 18 N 1 2026 Dafatir

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
D17.pdf793,8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.