Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/6670
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Salim Fathy Meridji | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2004 | - |
dc.date.available | 2004 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1112-3672 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/6670 | - |
dc.description | Revue Al Athar | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This paper intends, first, to expose the two ambiguities related to both the term ‘political discourse’ and the notion ‘political discourse analysis.’ The two ambiguities are clearly explained. Later, the concern of the paper will be with the two confusions existing in both Shapiro’s (1981) and Graber’s (1981) definitions of political discourse. At the end, the very appropriate definition of political discourse is provided. Actually, defining political discourse on the basis of contextual features blocks the rise of ambiguities and confusions. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | numéro 03 2004; | - |
dc.subject | political discourser analysis | - |
dc.subject | ambiguity | - |
dc.subject | confusion | - |
dc.subject | critical linguistics | - |
dc.subject | context | - |
dc.subject | institution | - |
dc.subject | political genres | - |
dc.title | Political Discourse Analysis between Ambiguities and Clarity | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | numéro 03 2004 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.