Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/15919
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorوعواع صلاح الدين-
dc.contributor.authorمحجر ياسين-
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-
dc.date.available2017-12-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.issn2170-1121-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ouargla.dz/jspui/handle/123456789/15919-
dc.descriptionRevue des Sciences Sociales et Humainesen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to identify the relationship between stress, personality type (a,b) and general health among the workers of masila energy production institutions. The study also examined the effect of factors such as marital status, single, married, or widowed / divorced. Type of work: administrative, technical, field time. And years of work across three sub-categories (less than 5 years), (from 06 to 10 years), (over 11 years). In order to achieve the objectives of this study, the descriptive methode was adopted. With a sample size of 182 people working in energy production facilities in masila (workers of the electricity production company [SPE], industrial equipment maintenance company [MEI]). Applying the occupational stress scale (oss). The butner scale for the personal type (A, B). General health questionnaire (12 items). The results showed that 55% of working individuals suffer from a high level of stress, a low level of public health, 18% of the average level, 32% of the level of maintaining pressure with a high level of public health. The most influential dimensions of stress were: management of problems and relationships with others at work, management role, argonomia, physical environment of workplace, safety and security, track and career achievement, work-family overlap, organizational structure. The incidence of stress levels among the respondents was associated with the type of work in the first place. The category of the most affected areas was followed by the technicians, followed by the administrative category. The differences between the study sample in the personality pattern were somewhat similar, but pattern a was predominant. Type a did not correlate with the overall health level of the study sample. It was also found that the sample of the sample had an average public health level of 42.80%, which is acceptable.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnumero 31 Déc 2017;-
dc.subjectStressen_US
dc.subjectPersonality Type (A,B)en_US
dc.subjectGeneral Healthen_US
dc.subjectenergy institutionsen_US
dc.titleعلاقة الضغوط وأنماط الشخصية والصحة العامة دراسة ميدانية بمؤسسات إنتاج الطاقةen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:numéro 31 SSH 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
S3145.pdf174,85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.